What are area school districts doing? Is it that different than what we are doing? Pondering.............

Brookfield School District made the front page for their continuous improvement efforts.  I found this article interesting.  I see a continuos improvement mindset in our district also.  At the Leadership Training I am at today with the principals, the main topic is focus.  With all that is happening in education, as leaders we need to keep the focus on 6 or less things.  Anything we are asking educators to focus on as leaders we need to put our time into "treasure hunts" - providing weekly or at least monthly feedback through finding the jewels that people are doing, sharing the good, and promoting the collaboration and support of others in the learning. 

What is Relevancy? Helping students find relevance

1. Relevance is the concept of one topic being connected to another topic in a way that makes it useful to consider the first topic when considering the second. 

Psychology Teacher Network | September 2013

Helping students find relevance

Teaching the relevance of course content can help students develop into engaged, motivated and self-regulated learners.

By Robin Roberson

As instructors, we’ve all heard these commonly asked questions, “Yeah, but what am I gonna use this for?” or “What’s this have to do with me?” These are questions often asked by students who must take a class but initially do not find the content worthy of their time or effort. When they ask a question like this, they are not necessarily looking to be disruptive; often they are looking for relevance.

From my educational experiences — 23 years as a student, 10 years as a public school teacher, and currently as a university teaching assistant — I am convinced that relevance is one of the most important aspects of teaching and learning. I know that as a student, the content I found most relevant was the easiest to learn, so as a teacher, I believe it is my job to help students see the relevance in content they may not find inherently interesting. I know that if I do this, my students will engage in class and be motivated to work outside of class.

Relevance is a difficult concept to pin down. It is mentioned in the education literature, but usually as an aside and seldom with an explanation as to its nature or structure. In an informal survey of the six educational psychology books in my personal library (i.e., I checked their extensive subject indices), only one mentioned relevance but did not define it (Ormrod, 2006). Based on my experiences, I define relevance as the perception that something is interesting and worth knowing. When a teacher provides relevance for a student, the teacher helps the student perceive these two things. This aligns relatively well with the theory of relevance found in the related area of cognitive science. Wilson and Sperber (2004) put forth this theory in the mid-80s which posits: “…utterances raise expectations of relevance not because speakers are expected to obey a Co-operative Principle and maxims or some other specifically communicative convention, but because the search for relevance is a basic feature of human cognition, which communicators may exploit.” While this may sound somewhat Machiavellian, all it means is that when a speaker (teacher) provides relevance for a listener (student), the speaker conveys his or her intentions to the listener (teaching/learning) by tapping into the listener’s cognitive need to make sense of the world. Relevance is important to teaching and learning because it is directly related to student engagement and motivation (Frymier & Schulman, 1995; Martin & Dowson, 2009).

Returning to my definition, relevance is the perception that something is interesting and worth knowing, notice that it has two parts (1) interest and (2) worth knowing. Many attempt to add relevance to otherwise uninteresting content by focusing efforts on creating interest. They do this by adding in anything that draws attention, like flashy digital presentations, humor or games. These may attract the attention of students, but, if the content that follows is not substantive or well explained so that students find it engaging and worth knowing, then their attention will likely wane. The students will remember the flashiness, humor or who won/lost the game, but they will not remember the content. In a teaching/learning setting, relevance should draw and hold students’ attention. No matter how disinteresting content may seem, once students have determined that the content is worth knowing, then it will hold their attention and engage them. I am not saying that flashy presentations, humor and games are useless in a lesson; I am saying that if those are used, they need to lead to learning about content that is relevant.

Two basic ways to provide relevance for students: utility value and relatedness

Utility value

Utility value answers the question “Yeah, but what am I gonna use this for?” Utility value is purely academic and emphasizes the importance that content has for the students’ future goals — both short-term and long-term goals (Ormrod, 2006). For example, physics tends to be less than fascinating to your average student, but for a student who wants to be an engineer, physics is interesting and can also hold great utility value. Utility value provides relevance first by piquing students’ interest — telling them the content is important to their future goals; it then continues by showing or explaining how the content fits into their plans for the future. This helps students realize the content is not just interesting but also worth knowing.

Relatedness

Relatedness on the other hand, answers the question “What’s this have to do with me?” Relatedness is an inherent need students have to feel close to the significant people in their lives, including teachers (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Relatedness is seen by many as having nonacademic and academic sides. The nonacademic side of relatedness emphasizes the relationship the instructor has with students. Integral to this side of relatedness is the understanding that students need to feel close to their teachers and are more likely to listen to, learn from and perhaps identify with the ones they like (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Students come to value what a likeable instructor says, seeing it as something worth learning because the instructor sees it as something worth knowing. This is why genuine enthusiasm expressed during instruction is important; it shows students how important the content is to the instructor. Helping support this relationship is the academic side of relatedness that emphasizes helping students see how current learning relates to their own knowledge and experience and their future learning. Through the years I have learned that students recognize how much effort it can take to provide relevance, and they see the effort expended on them as care. Students often respond to this perceived care by caring about the teacher and what he or she teaches. Relatedness provides relevance to students first via the developing relationship between teacher and student — this piques students’ interest in what the teacher has to say. Relevance then helps students see that the content is worth knowing by showing how it fits into their current and future frame of reference.

As instructors, one of the most important things we do is provide relevance for students. It gives them a context within which they can develop into engaged, motivated and self-regulated learners. Relatedness is important to students of all ages, while utility value tends to gain importance as students become older and choose classes that will help them choose or achieve their career goals. Relevance is exceptionally important to students who are required to take classes they did not choose, such as general education courses. Relevance can help students realize how useful all knowledge can be. Fulfilling students’ need for relatedness, showing them how seemingly unrelated content fits together and then into their own scheme of things, and giving students real reasons why today’s content will be useful to them later on are all good ways to provide relevance for students. You can help them discover that what you teach is actually interesting and worth knowing.

Activities to help students find relevance

In this article I listed two ways instructors can provide relevance for students: relatedness and utility value. In class, relatedness is the primary method I use to provide relevance for my students; interestingly enough though, by using relatedness, I am also able to provide utility value for many of them. I hope you find these activities helpful in your quest to provide relevance.

Relatedness activity: Class introductions

It sounds silly, but taking time out on the first day of class to learn a little bit about your students and let them learn a bit about you can make a big difference. Knowing why they took your class; what they do in their spare time; and what their goals, aspirations and dreams are can provide insight into how to relate class information to them (e.g., interest or utility value) for the rest of the course. On the flip side, telling them similar things about yourself lets students know you are human and approachable — the first step to achieving relatedness.

Relatedness activity: Student input

Whether during discussion or in written form, having students relate their own perceptions and experiences to the current topic is a great way to provide relevance. In my classes, as in many of yours, students are supposed to read before coming to class. To enforce this, I have my students write a one- to two-page reflective essay on their reading that is due before class. What I ask them to do, which may be different, is reflect on a personal or vicarious experience and explain how the experience relates to the reading. By providing relevance in this way, it helps students to process information on a deeper level. Student reflections can also provide fodder for class discussion, so I make sure to read the reflections before class. Discussing with students how their experiences relate to the topic allows you to clarify their understanding or correct their misunderstanding. It also can stimulate related comments and responses from other students. I do caution that you check with students before using their reflections in an open forum and that you not allow individual students to monopolize the discussion time

Lingo - Lango for Social Studies Learning: Are you into DBQ's?

Document Based Questions (DBQ) assess the ability of each student to work with historical sources in multiple forms.  The DBQ requires many of the same skills used in developing a research paper - interpreting primary and secondary sources, evaluating sources, considering multiple points of view, using historic evidence, developing and supporting a thesis.

Document-based questions:

• are based on the Social Studies Learning Standards, themes and concepts.
• focus on critical thinking skills and ask students to make comparisons, draw analogies, apply knowledge to the given data, and require students to apply historic analysis.
• ask students to take positions on issues or problems and support their conclusions.
• require students to look at issues from multiple perspectives.
• require student to apply skills thy use as adults
• are criterion referenced and employ a scoring rubric.

Check out this site for examples of DBQ's from grade 2-11.  Revise as needed.  Kathy

Reflections on Guided Reading - worth pondering

GUIDEDREADINGThe Romance and the RealityIrene C. Fountas ■ Gay Su Pinnell

As I read and re-read this article over the summer, I thought it made some really thought-provoking points.  As everything in the world, "guided reading" terminology needs to be defined.  I think if you are getting high results you are probably grouping students and explicitly teaching to meet their unique needs such as the repetition needed, skill breakdown needed or coaching of a skill for independence.  Listening to yourself to see how much you are talking and how much the students are talking is also very key.  Many of us, like myself, love to share and talk but it is the students who need to share and talk the most during today's instruction.  Teaching is very challenging - I just wish more of the world would understand that.  Perhaps we need to have a teacher and parents allow a "reality tv" produce "A Year of Learning" to showcase the life of an educator from start to finish of a school year.  Oh well, time to allow you to ponder the article.  kathy

http://www.heinemann.com/fountasandpinnell/supportingmaterials/fountaspinnell_revdreadingteacherarticle12_2012.pdf

Let us not forget the pending Social Studies 4th and 8th grade test -

Hi everyone,

You may have received an update this morning from the State Superintendent regarding the new Forward WI tests. Please note that this test simply replaces the Badger Exam for ELA & Mathematics. Social Studies is not mentioned because it is a separate test from the Forward WI test. WKCE is not being used this fall for science or social studies. We are in the process of getting bids for a new test, which will be in spring of 2016. Please see Dr. Evers back to school updates here: http://wisocstlistserv.blogspot.com/2015/09/back-to-school-updates-and-resources.html .

Hope this helps!

Kris

Kris McDaniel

Social Studies Consultant

WI Department of Public Instruction

kristen.mcdaniel@dpi.wi.gov (608) 266-2207

To change one's life; Start immediately. Do it flamboyantly. No exceptions. -- William James

State Assessment Update- Wisconsin Forward Exam

This information is helpful but just reminds me of the perseverance and resiliency of our WI teachers who once again will be learning a new assessment.  Kudos to the educators of our children in Wisconsin.  Personally I think we have been too focused on Accountability which has its root in counting and need to return to responsibility which has its root in responding  - responding to each child's unique emotional, social, and academic needs.  It has always been about being responsible; that is why we chose this as a career -- to build the potential in each child one at a time.  Just pondering today - what do you think?  Kathy

Dear School and District Leaders,

The biennial budget (2015 Wisconsin Act 55) required the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) to procure a new state assessment for students in the 2015-16 school year. The new assessment, known as the Wisconsin Forward Exam, will be administered in spring 2016 in English language arts and mathematics in grades 3 through 8, and science in grades 4, 8, and 10. High school students in grades 9 through 11 will continue to take the ACT suite of exams.

Data Recognition Company (DRC), a Midwestern assessment company with a Wisconsin office, was successful in a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) procurement process to develop, administer, and report results on the new Forward Exam. The procurement was conducted by the Department of Administration for DPI.

We are pleased to announce that this online assessment will be specifically developed for Wisconsin students, with input from Wisconsin educators. The Forward Exam is expected to be shorter than the Badger Exam. We thank you for your patience as we went through the RFP process. We will do our best to ensure a smooth transition to the Forward Exam. In the interest of stability for our students, educators, families, and school communities, it is out hope that we will retain the Forward Exam for years to come.

Further information about the exam and its administration will be communicated to your district assessment coordinator (DAC) in coming months. For more information, please contact the Office of Student Assessment at osamail@dpi.wi.gov or visit http://oea.dpi.wi.gov/assessment/forward.

Sincerely,

Mike Thompson, PhD

Deputy State Superintendent

Thanks for joining on online global learning network!